The Authors' Directory

Researchers must submit their research electronically in the research submission system on the journal's website via this link: https://radab.mosuljournals.com/

 

1: Research presentation:

1-1: Requirements for submitting the research for the first time:

      Researchers can choose to present their research as a single file to be used in the evaluation process.

 

1-2: Requirements for submitting the corrected research:

        When the research is in the correction stage after the evaluation, the researchers will be asked to amend the research in the correct format required of the journal according to the residents' opinions to accept publication and provide the journal with any additional elements to publish the research.

 

1-3: Instructions for the names of the researchers:

    The names of the researchers should be assigned to the research based on:

1. Significant contributions to study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

2. Formulating or reviewing the research essentially of the intellectual content.

3. Final approval of the final copy sent for publication.

    The researchers participating in the research must fulfill all the conditions above. Funding research, data collection, or general supervision of the research group is considered insufficient for the researcher's name to be mentioned among the names of its participants. Accordingly, the contributors to the research who do not meet the aforementioned defining conditions can be added in thanks and appreciation. All researchers must agree to Their sequence before sending the research for publication (in the case of master's thesis extracts and doctoral theses preceding the name of the supervising student). A consensus is obtained before all researchers on the assignment of one researcher To be the researcher responsible for the correspondence, who will be responsible for arranging the entire research based on the requirements of the journal, as well as for the dialogue with the researchers participating in the evaluation and linguistic review phase, as well as working on their behalf.

 

2: Before you start:

2-1: Publishing ethics in the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain:

     The ethics policy of Adab Al-Rafidain magazine is based on guidelines issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) that are consistent with the code of conduct approved by the journal's editorial board. Therefore, readers, researchers, evaluators, and members of the editorial board must follow these ethical policies once working with the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain, and the ethical policy approved by the journal is responsible for determining which type of research papers or scientific research submitted to the journal should be published.

      The decision to publish in the Journal of Adab al-Rafidain is based on the recommendations of the evaluators and the opinion of the members of the journal editing committee. Based on the content presented confidentially, the scientific evaluator makes suggestions to researchers. To improve the quality of research and its quality with attached comments, researchers must ensure that their research submitted for publication is original research not published in a journal. If any plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior, and this behavior is unacceptable, for information about publishing ethics, follow the following link:  https://radab.mosuljournals.com/journal/process?ethics

 

2-2: Research evaluation process:

      To maintain the research evaluation system, researchers are obligated to participate in the evaluation process of scientific research also in the journal sent by other researchers, and the need and scarcity of specialization may prompt the authors to submit the names of an evaluator or a group of evaluators to the Editor-in-Chief; To refer the research submitted for publication therein to at least two or three evaluators, and the Journal of Adab al-Rafidain adopts a double-coverage review policy. Because the researchers do not know of those in charge of the evaluation at a time when the evaluators are also ignorant of the responsible researchers, and the research evaluation process is completed with the online research submission system, and after the research is sent, the system immediately notifies the chief editor of the journal to send a paper for publication in the journal,

    After a preliminary examination of the research by the journal's expert and determining the extent of the research's commitment to the journal's publication terms and the percentage of scientific placement of the research, the research is referred to the editor-in-chief. To assign a member of the editorial board according to the specialization of the research to review the research and preliminary access to it, approve its topic, and determine the extent to which it meets certain criteria in addition to the feasibility of studying the topic, and the results and recommendations presented in this research, and this stage includes comments and online citations on the published research Two or more to conduct the research evaluation, and often three evaluators are identified,

   After completing the evaluation process and receiving the scientific evaluation reports, the editor-in-chief decides on this research because the evaluators may sometimes not agree with each other about the research evaluation. Therefore, in exceptional cases, the research evaluation report may not reflect the final decision that the evaluator sent to the editor-in-chief, and this decision after each evaluation round is one of the following decisions:

 1. Acceptance of the research without any other changes.

2. Acceptance of the research with minor corrections; the research may be sent with the final correction to the evaluators To approve the repairs made by the researcher.

3. Accept the research with large corrections and send the research with the final correction to the evaluators. To approve and endorse repairs.

4. Refuse to publish the research submitted for publication.

5. Unable to evaluate research: Another evaluator is assigned to evaluate the research scientifically.

 

2-3: Research evaluation before publication:

      In addition to the initial evaluation process and the final evaluation, the editorial board reviews papers before their final publication by the editor-in-chief and linguistic evaluators, each according to his language. This method is described as revision and filtering to ensure the quality of the published research. For the research to appear in a linguistic bask that is as free of errors as possible and to publish quickly the topics of specialization in the scientific departments of the College of Arts and the University of Mosul.

 

3: Preparing the research paper:

    The research is submitted for publication in Arabic, English, French, or Turkish in the journal. It must be written according to the appropriate writing and spelling rules. The papers must be written in the Times New Roman) font for research written in foreign languages and the Simplified Arabic font for research written in the Arabic language, with Font size (14) in the text and (12) in the margin, original printing in Microsoft Word), on a printed area measuring 15 cm x 24 cm, and the papers are submitted once to obtain an identifier number for the search in the journal. It can cause sending the research more than once to reject it. The research does not include the names of researchers, with a file attached in the section of uploading files, the title of which is the addresses of the researchers, in which the researcher writes details of his data such as the full name, academic title, certificate, place of work and his mobile number.

 

1-3: Writing in the English language:

           All papers submitted for publication in Adab of Al-Rafidain Journal must have an extract in the language of the research together with another English or Arabic language. It must be ensured that the current research is printed in a formal language (according to the language of the body) before submitting the research. The text of the research must be written in good language. Hence (the main method is accepted in that language); To produce the research in a good way, the editorial board works to provide editing services for the full text of the research according to the journal template; in addition, researchers who believe that their research needs a linguistic evaluation prefer to remove these grammatical or spelling errors before submitting the research. To reduce the burden on the editorial staff in checking and correction, and in this case, they should obtain these services before submitting the paper for publication in the journal.

 

2-3: Submit new research:

    The research is submitted electronically to the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain website via the Internet, and researchers are guided step-by-step in creating and uploading research files as part of the application process. These files cannot be used in the evaluation process, and all the figures and tables should be added to the main research file.

 

3-3: Sources:

   Details of the sources on which the theoretical aspect of the research is based must be given according to the method used by the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain. Suppose this applies (which is the inclusion of sources at the bottom of the page, and in the case of their first occurrence, full bibliographic data is mentioned, and in the case of quoting a second time from the same source, the name of the author is written with a previous source paragraph, and the page number is mentioned). Here, the researcher must know all the citation sources with the information. Its bibliography such as the name (s) of the researcher (researchers) and the research title. In that case, the name of the journal or its abbreviation, the volume, its number, and the date of its publication, and about the book, article, or chapter, the name of the author (s) shall be the title of the article/chapter/book, and the publication date: (Place of publication, publisher, year of publication). The page number cited and the digital document identification number, known as DOI, should be added, if any.

 

 3-4: Coordination Requirements:

     There are no strict formatting requirements a journal needs. The journal coordinates the full text of the research according to the publication template. Still, all research must contain the necessary basic elements, for example, the abstract (in both languages), keywords (no less than three terms in two languages), the introduction, thanks, appreciation, and praise, and the general framework. Please include all figures and tables in the main research file for the study, previous studies, discussion or theoretical side, findings, and recommendations.

 

 3-5: Submit research after evaluation:

          Regardless of the format of the initial submission file, especially after evaluating the evaluators' corrections, researchers are required to submit a complete research file that includes the final form after taking into account the evaluators' comments made earlier in the initial evaluation of it in a received document; To avoid unnecessary errors from the ideas and mistakes that the evaluators excluded in the first evaluation round, the researchers are advised to use "spellcheck" and "grammar check" for the submitted file, and at this stage also should not include the name of the researcher (the researchers), and the point of affiliation of the researcher.

 

 6.3: Presentation of the Research File:

     All researchers contributing to the submission of their research to the journal must verify that the research represents correct work, as well as that the research has not been fully published in another journal or that it contains content similar to a large extent to the research of other authors, as well as the consent of the other authors to authorize Working with Adab Al-Rafidain   Journal to review the research, make evaluators' corrections, and prove its validity.

 

3-7: Research presentation and verification:

     Research papers must not have been previously published in digital or paper form, and at the same time, they must not be subject to evaluation in another journal. Copies of the references that are likely to be duplicated in the current research must be submitted (including those similar to the content of the current research) to a large extent or use the same data (that were previously published or under review in another journal).

 

4: Structure of research submitted for publication in the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain:

       The research submitted for publication in the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain shall be as follows:

           Title (search language and second language); Scientific abstract (research language and second language), no less than three keywords (research language and second language) introduction, study framework, and previous studies (and conflicts of interest); The theoretical side and discussion, findings and recommendations or conclusion, noting that the sources are listed at the bottom of the page, and their full bibliographic data are mentioned in case they are cited for the first time.

 

 4-1: Title Page:

          The first page of the search includes the search title in the original search language, along with other title details such as the parallel title, abbreviation of the title, or other data for the title or subtitle, and all these details are written in another language that is one of the living languages, Arabic or English.

 

4-2: Research Title:

     The title must not exceed 17 words and not include abbreviations without mentioning the full words of the abbreviation while avoiding complex and vague expressions that are not understood. The title should be direct, not exaggerated, and not be an informative title.

 

 3-4: Abstract:

       The abstract is prepared according to the scientific conditions to accomplish the abstracts of the research of scientific and academic journals. It is preferred that the abstract be no less than 100 to 350 words in which it defines the goal and purpose of the study and the scientific method used in the study, mentioning the tool used in that approach. There are multiple approaches used in the humanities. Each of these curricula has its tools for collecting data, the limits of the study and the basic methods used in it, previous studies, the place of the current study thereof, the justification for working on this study, and the most important findings and recommendations reached by the research or conclusion. It must be focused on modernity. The topic and this part should not include any abbreviations or sources.

 

 4-4: Keywords:

        Three (3) must be added to five (5) keywords that can be used. The keywords must not be repeated or abstracted by the research title for indexing and searching. It is preferable to choose them from the text, the central words in the research, those around which the research revolves, or the most frequent scientific in the research. They must be written in alphabetical order, separated by abbreviations, separated by abbreviations in alphabetical order. It is first mentioned in the body of the paper or in its margins, which will be used briefly later in the research text.

 

4-5: Highlighting the study:

   Research highlighting paragraphs, a set of brief and short phrases. To display the main results of your research:

 

 4-6: Introduction, Thanks and Appreciation:

       Briefly describe the scientific background of the research, its topic, and the presentation of the scientific treatment that will be contained in the body of the research, and thanks and appreciation should be given to the persons who contributed significantly to the research who do not meet the criteria of the researchers participating in the research, and the grants and funds must be mentioned and how supportive organizations can obtain them. , And the start and end date of the financial support, with this part including the grant number provided by the supporting organizations.

 

4-7: The general framework of the study:

          Adequate details of the study problem shall be provided in the section of the study problem or its problem with research questions or hypotheses that the researcher sets in mind to be dealt with in the body of the theoretical or analytical study, and a clear identification of the objectives and importance of the study, and a detail of the scientific method and its tools used in collecting and analyzing the data under study; To enable the re-conduct of the current study experiments, including the techniques used, the methods used by various scientific sources, and the research boundaries, whether they are temporal, spatial, objective, or any limits that the researcher deems necessary; To narrow the scope of the research he is working on, the previous studies that dealt with the subject of the research, and the place of the current study, What is new in the study, and the justification for its completion, a statement of conflict of interest in the research must be placed as follows: Researchers declare that the research is free from any conflict of interest regarding the publication of this research.

 

4-8 Discussion:

      Discussion includes presenting opinions, ideas, and topics related to the research topic. If the researcher relies on the sources in this field and begins with the discussion of topics, quotes, and proposing ideas, which he begins by discussing and analyzing according to the method of the study from the sources that he has adopted and based on in the research, and here also the figures are included, the models, the results of the questionnaires, and their analysis. According to the scientific approach specified by the researcher for his research, as well as the tables, drawings, and figures that the researcher uses in the research, which connected him to the final data, the tables, and figures must be numbered in the order that they are mentioned in the text.

 

 4-8: Findings, Conclusions, or Conclusion:

     The results reached by the researcher from the tools of all the data, the methodology used, and their importance are written clearly and directly. In cases of short research, results can be combined with discussion. As for the conclusions, they are the meanings of the numbers that the researcher has reached in the discussion paragraph, and here, there is no need to mention the numbers, ratios, and statistics that the researcher reached and the ideas that came to them from behind the data that he collected. They must be direct, concise, and not interpreted.

 

 4-9: Conclusion:

        The researcher adds the conclusion, which is a summary of what he arrived at from the discussion in the research body. Hence, the researcher works to put forward the ideas that he arrived at as a result of the treatment of the research problem.

 

 4-10: Margins and sources:

     The sources mentioned in the text must be numbered in parentheses sequentially in the order in which they were first received and listed at the bottom of the body, whether for books or journals. It is preferable to translate them into English.

 

4-11: Examples of types of sources:

- Research in the magazine: Zain Al-Abidin, Ammar Abd Al-Latif, Al-Tai, Rami Rakan Arab. Information services in university libraries. Journal of Adab    Al-Rafidain S47, No. 77 2018. p. 230.

- Book: Qasim, Nizar Muhammad Li Qasim. Introduction to Information Science .- Mosul: University Book House, 1989.- 304 p.

- Master's thesis or PhD thesis: Al-Taie, Muhammad Ahmad Khaled. The use of card indexes in the central library of the University of Mosul: an evaluation study from the point of view of the librarians (Master's thesis) Mosul: University of Mosul, 2005. 150 p.

 

4-12: Tables:

        The tables, figures, and statistics mentioned in the research cannot be presented as an image; rather, they must be adjusted accordingly, and the internal horizontal and vertical rules are not used. Et al.), and enough information is added in the title of figures and tables so that each table is understandable without the need to refer to the text. An explanatory explanation (title) is added to the table explaining the components of the table. The source related to these figures or tables is added in a source form in the list of sources. With the explanatory labels placed above in sufficient and not repeated numbers, the footnotes for the tables must be indicated in lowercase letters. (Or asterisks for significant values ​​and other statistical data), and their inclusion below the text of the table.

 

4-13: Numbers:

•   Figures/illustrations should be of high quality in the order of 200-300 dpi, and ensure that the figures are clear, tagged, and of their size. As the editorial board can reproduce it in the journal, the numbers must be specified within the text, and the following notes must be applied to the numbers:
•  Each figure must include a brief explanation that accurately describes what the figure depicts, including the explanatory labels in the body of the research.
• The explanatory designations of the figure begin with the term numbers, and the numbers, with the explanatory designations, are sufficient, sufficient, and clear numbers.
• Punctuation marks are not placed at the end of a caption.
• Identify previously published or cited materials by including the source information as a reference citation at the end of the paper.

 

5: Criteria for researchers' participation:

      Researchers majorly contribute to data design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation. All researchers participate in drafting or reviewing the research definitively, and all researchers confirm that they have reviewed the final version of the research and approved it in addition to the publication of the paper.

 

6: Conflict of Interest:

   Researchers are asked to clarify whether or not imminent conflicts and research overlaps exist. Suppose one of the organizations or institutions includes any financial interest or interest in the study results. In that case, the researchers must submit a declaration stating full access to all the data in the study, and he bear full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of its analysis of its relevance and objectivity. Depending on the type and topic), the Ethics Committee / Institutions Review Board related to the institutions concerned, and researchers who wish to include figures, tables, or text sections that have been previously published elsewhere must obtain permission from the owner (copyright owners) of each From the printed form, and online; To indicate that this permission has been granted when submitting their papers concerning it, and it will be assumed that the researchers have published any materials received without this evidence and the copyright transfer agreement will be signed by the corresponding author, based on the acceptance of the research, on behalf of all researchers for publication; Be legally responsible for the journal's ethics and privacy policy. The researchers will be notified as soon as possible of the decisions related to the suitability of their research for publication in the journal as soon as the research is accepted for publication. It will be edited and copied, and then information about access to his research will be sent to the researcher for the sake of correction other than correcting typographical errors, and this stage cannot be observed. There are no fees for publishing research in the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain,

 

 7: The role of funding sources:

     Researchers are required to identify who provided financial support to conduct the research and prepare the research and briefly describe the role of the funder/sponsor in any part of the work, including designing and conducting the study, collecting management data, analyzing it, agreeing it, preparing it, and preparing it. The following rules must be followed:

1. The sentence should begin with: 'This action was supported by ...'.

2. The name of the official funding agency must be given in full in a form that can be expanded and not in an abbreviated form.

3. Grant numbers must be complete, accurate, and provided in parentheses: [Grant number ABX CDXXXXXX].

4. Multiple grant numbers should be separated with a comma as follows: "[Grant numbers ABX CDxxxxxxxxxxx."

5. Agencies should be separated by two points (thanks to "and" before the last funding agency).

 

 8: Errors in Published Papers:

     When researchers discover a major error or inaccuracy in the data of his published research, and he obliges the author to notify the editor or publisher of the journal immediately to withdraw the research or correct it in its final form approved by the evaluators, and it must be ensured that the researcher responsible for the correspondence has seen all of the participants (on the participants). The research has approved the final version, agreed to it, and submitted it for publication.

 

9: Preventing plagiarism and violating publication ethics:

     All research that is evaluated or previously published is screened using a plagiarism prevention program (ithenticate). Plagiarism is a serious violation of publishing ethics. Other violations include duplicate research, data fabrication and falsification, and improper credit of the researcher's contribution. Therefore, plagiarism, fraud, or inaccurate data on purpose constitutes unethical behavior unacceptable, and submitting the same research to multiple journals simultaneously is an unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior to 20% and more. CrossCheck has developed a service that helps editors verify the authenticity of research. CrossCheck is powered by iParadigms' Ithenticate. For a searchable list of all journals in CrossCheck's database, please visit www.ithenticate.com/ search. All new papers submitted to Adab  Al-Rafidain journal are automatically examined using (CrossCheck) within the editing system, and the Editorial Board member can also choose to run the similarity report at any other point during the review or post-publication process. With one or more published research and re-use of the legitimately cited text, it may contribute to reducing the percentage of plagiarism.

 

10: Submission of the Final Checklist:

  1. Read the journal's guide for researchers and make sure that the current research (text, tables, and figures) meets the journal's requirements.

2. The research includes the main sections shown in the journal's handbook for the researcher.

3.   Checking spelling for the paper.

4. All researchers must read publishing ethics, prevent plagiarism and violate publication ethics, and deal with misconduct cases before submitting them to the Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain.

5. The research has been read and approved by all listed researchers.

6. It is advisable to register on the journal's website not only for the researcher responsible for the correspondence but also for all researchers contributing to the research To keep their names properly.

7. The conflict of interest disclosure form must be signed by the researcher responsible for the correspondence, in the case of multiple authorship, by all researchers. To be legally responsible for the journal's ethics and privacy policy.                                                       

 

11. Using the digital ID:

     The digital identification document number can cite and link electronic documents with a unique alphanumeric character string assigned to the search upon electronic publication. These numbers never change, and researchers can use digital documents to create links to documents on the web.

 

12: International Creativity Foundation:

    Allowing others to distribute and reproduce research papers, and create extracts, abstracts, and other revised publications or edits or derivative works of the research (such as translation); To include the collective work, as long as they attribute these works to the researchers, and do not represent the researcher as endorsing their adaptation of the material, nor amending it in a way that harms the author's standing and reputation, more details are available in Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). The Journal of Adab al-Rafidain maintains copyright for the research published in it, which is issued under the "creative license," which allows the unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the research by any means, provided that the original file is properly cited in the work.

 

13: Fees for publishing the research:

    Publication in magazines with free publication gives a relatively new paradigm; Publication of scientific journals provides barrier-free access around the world to the full text of all published research and provides free access to all readers interested in viewing, downloading, printing, and redistributing any research without subscribing to the journal's website, which allows for a larger distribution of the publication's work. To subscribe to the journal's website or paper-based publishing system.

     In journals that follow the open-access model, publishing costs are paid from the budget of the researcher or researchers who published the research or by the institution where the researcher works. The Journal of Adab Al-Rafidain is one of the open-access journals. Therefore, publishing the research in this journal requires payment of US $ 100. To publish the accepted research, there are no fees for submitting the research.